Skip to main content
Rooted Women's Nutrition

Free guide · About 12 minutes · nothing to buy

Is It Food or Your Hormones?

A 14-day charting exercise to find out whether your bad days cluster — before you cut one more food.

At the end you will know one thing about your body you do not know today: whether your bad days cluster.

by Maya Chen, MS, RDN, LD — Rooted Women's Nutrition. Certified Monash FODMAP practitioner. 11 years as a registered dietitian: six in a hospital GI clinic, five in private practice.

Chart it in the browserEmail me the PDF and template

The whole guide is below. No email required to read it.

Read this first

Read this first

"Is it the bread or my hormones?" I get this question weekly.

"Is it the bread or my hormones?" I get this question weekly.

Usually it arrives with a spreadsheet attached, and the spreadsheet has no pattern in it. Same salad, fine on Tuesday, ruinous on Thursday. "It worked for like three weeks and then it just stopped." I hear that sentence constantly.

Here is what this guide does. It explains why your results have contradicted each other, then hands you a fourteen-day exercise you run yourself, starting tomorrow morning. At the end you will know one thing about your body you do not know today: whether your bad days cluster.

Here is what it does not do. It does not diagnose anything. It gives you no food list, no protocol, and not one new food to fear. It is not medical care. Fourteen days of your own numbers is not an answer — it is the first honest measurement you have taken.

That is worth two weeks. It is not worth a dollar, and I am not asking for one.

Part 1

Why your results keep contradicting each other

You have done the work. That is the part nobody credits you for.

You have done the work. That is the part nobody credits you for.

You cut gluten. Then dairy. Then onions, then beans. You ran a free low-FODMAP handout properly, all the way through the elimination, and then the handout ended and there was no reintroduction plan and nobody to ask. Somewhere in there you paid for a panel. Then the endoscopy, the colonoscopy, the celiac panel. All normal. "My doctor keeps telling me everything's normal. Cool. I still can't button my jeans."

So here is the actual problem, and it is not you.

Every elimination diet on earth assumes one thing: that your baseline is stable. Remove a food, feel better, the food was the cause. That logic only holds if nothing else about your body is moving while you test.

But a lot of women notice symptoms cluster in the week before their period. So the same meal can produce a terrible day on cycle day 24 and nothing at all on cycle day 10. That is why your results kept contradicting each other.

It is like trying to weigh yourself on a scale sitting on a boat. Every reading is real, and every reading is also wrong, because the deck is moving underneath you. You can step on that scale forty times with great discipline and get forty numbers that don't agree. The discipline was never the variable.

The Three-Week Trap

This has a shape you will recognise. You cut gluten strictly. Week one, better. Week two, much better. Week three, still good — you tell someone about it. Week four, it stops.

Three weeks is shorter than one cycle. A three-week trial cannot return a trustworthy answer, because you never saw the same food land in two different parts of your month. You measured one window and called it a result. When the next window changed the result, you did not conclude the measurement was too short. You concluded you had done it wrong.

That is why "it worked for three weeks and then it just stopped" hurts more than a clean failure. A clean failure tells you something. That one just makes you distrust your own read on yourself.

The reframe

You are not undisciplined. You are un-sequenced.

Everyone tested food first — you, the handout, the panel, the app. Food is the last thing to test, because you cannot measure a food reaction on a baseline that moves. So we don't test food first. We chart symptoms against cycle days, subtract those weeks from the analysis, and only then reintroduce foods one at a time.

We fix the measurement first. Then we test.

Four years of contradictory results is not four years of failure. It is good data collected under bad conditions. The next fourteen days change the conditions.

Part 2

What a cycle overlay actually is

Plain version, one sentence at a time.

Plain version, one sentence at a time.

A cycle overlay is a chart with two things on it: how bad your day was, and what cycle day you were on. That is the whole instrument.

You are not tracking food. Not yet. You are asking one question fourteen times: how bad was today, and where was I in my month? You are looking for whether the bad days land in a window or land everywhere. Clustered, or scattered.

What this is, precisely

Pattern-spotting. Many women notice their gut symptoms intensify in the week before their period. Charting lets you see whether you are one of them, on your own numbers, instead of wondering.

What this is not

It is not a hormone test. Nothing in this exercise measures a hormone, and the chart cannot tell you that any hormone of yours is off.

It is not a diagnosis, and it cannot become one. A chart shows timing. Timing is a clue, not a condition.

It is not a reason to change your medical care. If a physician has you on something, you stay on it.

And it is not the food log in your Notes app. A food log asks "what did I eat before the bad day," which assumes a fixed baseline. That question has already failed you. This chart plots a second axis instead, and that is the whole difference: symptoms that land in a predictable window can be set aside before you conclude anything about lunch, and symptoms that land regardless belong to something else.

Nobody has ever charted this with you. That is the gap this fills, and you can fill it yourself.

Part 3

The 14-Day Overlay: do this yourself

This is the exercise. It takes under ninety seconds a day and it costs nothing.

This is the exercise. It takes under ninety seconds a day and it costs nothing.

What you log, every day, once

Six things, same time every evening.

  • Date.
  • Cycle day. (How to find it is below.)
  • Symptom score, 0–10. One number for the whole day, at its worst.
  • Peak time of day. The hour it was worst. "4pm" is a fine answer. "Evening" is not.
  • Bowel pattern. Two or three words. Loose, hard, urgent, normal, none. Don't dress it up.
  • Sleep hours. Rough is fine. It is here because a short night can read like a bad food day, and you want to see that later.

Then a notes field for anything unusual — a deadline, a migraine, a restaurant, travel. One line, not a paragraph.

The 0–10 symptom scale

Use the same scale every day or the chart is worthless. Anchor yourself to these five and interpolate the rest.

The 0 to 10 scale

0
Nothing. You got through the day without thinking about your stomach. Jeans buttoned at 6pm.
3
Noticeable, not limiting. Some distention by late afternoon. You noticed, and you changed nothing you were doing.
5
Managing around it. Unbuttoned under the desk. You skipped something, ate less than you wanted, or checked where the bathroom was.
8
Running your day. Visibly distended, uncomfortable to sit through a meeting. You cancelled or moved something. This is the "I look six months pregnant" day.
10
The worst it gets for you. Pain, not just pressure. You could not do what the day required. Reserve 10 for genuinely the worst — if every day is a 10, the chart has nothing to show you.

Score the day at its worst, not on average. A flat morning and a brutal 4pm is not a 4. It is whatever the 4pm was.

How to find and record cycle day

Cycle day 1 is the first day of real bleeding — full flow, not spotting. Count up from there. If your period started nine days ago, today is cycle day 10. That is all there is to it.

If your period starts partway through the fourteen days, do not restart the chart. Keep filling in the rows in order and reset the cycle-day column to 1 on the day it starts. That crossover is often the most informative part of the chart.

If you cannot work out where you are, write "unknown" in the first rows and start counting from your next day 1. An honest gap beats a guessed number.

The under-ninety-seconds rule

Ninety seconds, once a day, and then you close it.

You have tracked meticulously for nine days before and then stopped. That is not a character flaw. It is what happens when the log is too big. If it is taking five minutes you are doing more than I asked, and it will cost you the back half of the chart.

Set an alarm for the same time each night. Put the printed page somewhere you walk past — the fridge door works. If you'd rather do it on your phone, the tool at /interactive-tool holds the same fourteen rows.

Missed a day? Leave the row blank and carry on. Do not reconstruct it from memory. A blank row is data. An invented row is contamination.

What NOT to change during the fourteen days

This is the part people skip, and it is the part that makes the chart readable.

  • Do not start a new elimination. No cutting gluten "just to see." No fresh low-FODMAP round. Remove a variable partway through and you have two experiments running at once, neither of which will answer anything.
  • Do not change what you already eat. If you have already cut foods, keep them cut. Your current diet is the baseline, whatever it looks like.
  • Do not start or stop a supplement, a probiotic, or a fibre product.
  • Do not change any medication or care your physician has prescribed. Nothing here overrides your doctor.
  • Do not tidy up your eating first. A tidied-up fortnight measures a life you don't live.

You are not trying to feel better during these fourteen days. You are trying to see clearly. Different jobs.

If your cycle is irregular, suppressed, or absent

You may be reading this with an IUD, on continuous contraception, in perimenopause with cycles you can no longer predict, or with no period at all. Common, and a fair question.

To supply[OPERATOR INPUT: irregular-cycle policy]

Either way, the chart is still worth fourteen days. Log everything except cycle day and leave that column blank. You lose the second axis, so the cluster read in Part 4 will not be available to you. You still end up with fourteen honest, consistently scored days, which is more than you have ever handed a clinician. If a period arrives mid-chart, start counting from day 1.

Your 14-Day Overlay chart

Print this page. One row a night. Score at the worst point of the day.

Your 14-day overlay

Print this page, or use the charting tool if paper is not your thing.Three columns are hidden at this width and come back when you print.

DayDateCycle dayScore 0-10Notes
1Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
2Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
3Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
4Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
5Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
6Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
7Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
8Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
9Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
10Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
11Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
12Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
13Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 
14Date: blank Cycle day: blank Score 0-10: blank Notes: blank 

Prefer to do this on your phone? The same fourteen rows are at /interactive-tool.

What you're building

Symptom score against cycle day

Premenstrual window — cycle days 2428

02468101481216202428Cycle day
Days logged
28
Mean score, days 2428
7.6
Mean score, rest of cycle
3.7
An illustration of the instrument, not client data. On this example the worse days group inside the shaded window rather than scattering across everything eaten.

Part 4

How to read your own chart

Fourteen days done. Reading it takes ten minutes and a pen.

Fourteen days done. Reading it takes ten minutes and a pen.

Circle every day you scored 6 or higher. Those are your bad days. Write the cycle day next to each circle. Now look at those cycle numbers together and ask one question: are they near each other, or all over the place?

You will land in one of three reads.

Read A — The Cluster

What it looks like: Your circled days sit close together on the cycle-day axis. Three of your four worst days fall on cycle days 22 to 27, or they bunch in the days right before bleeding started. The good days sit elsewhere in the month.

What it means: Your symptoms appear to have a timing component. Not a cause — a timing. It also explains your past results: every food test you ran was scored partly inside that window and partly outside it, which produces contradictions on its own. Your gluten trial did not stop working. It ran into your window.

What to do next: Do not cut anything. Keep charting into the next cycle, because the read gets much stronger with a second one behind it. Mark the window on your calendar and stop asking lunch to explain those days.

Read B — The Scatter

What it looks like: Your bad days have no relationship to cycle day. A 9 on day 6 and a 9 on day 25. Good days in the window, bad days outside it. Nothing bunches.

What it means: On this fortnight, cycle timing does not look like your driver. That is a genuine result and it saves you months.

Check the other columns before you conclude anything. Do the bad days follow your short nights? Do they cluster by day of the week — Sunday after a restaurant, Monday after a work event? Does the peak time move, or is it always 4pm? Scatter on one axis often means signal on another.

What to do next: Keep the chart and take it to your own physician. "Here are fourteen consistently scored days, and here is what does and does not track" is a different conversation from "I feel bloated a lot." Cycle overlay is probably not your mechanism, and I would rather tell you that now than take your money later.

Read C — Not enough signal yet

What it looks like: The chart is flat — everything is a 5, or everything is a 7. Or there are five blank rows. Or you scored the first week carefully and the second week from memory on a Sunday night.

What it means: Nothing yet, and that is not a failure. A flat chart usually means the scale drifted, not that your days were identical — when every day is bad, an 8 starts to feel like a 5 by Thursday.

What to do next: Run it again, and change one thing: re-read the 0, the 5 and the 8 anchors each night for the first three days so the scale holds. If it was gaps, move the page somewhere you cannot avoid it, or switch to /interactive-tool. Nobody reads their first chart well. The second one is usually the good one.

The honest caveat

Fourteen days is one partial cycle. Whatever you are looking at is provisional.

One window is a hint. The same window twice is a pattern. Fourteen days is enough to tell you whether this is worth following, and not enough to build a food plan on. Anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you speed.

Part 5

What to do with what you found

Three honest doors. Pick by what your chart actually said.

Three honest doors. Pick by what your chart actually said.

  • Flat or gappy (Read C): run fourteen more days first. Nothing to decide yet.
  • Scattered (Read B): door one or door three. Not door two — cycle overlay is not your mechanism, and I would rather say so than sell around it.
  • Clustered (Read A): any of the three. Here is the honest difference between them.

Door one — keep charting on your own

Completely reasonable, and it is free.

Chart another full cycle. Mark your window. Then, if you want to test one food, test it properly: outside the window, long enough to see it twice. Not three weeks — you already know how a three-week trial ends.

What you will run into is the part with no DIY version: the order to test forty candidate foods in, how much of each, and how to read a result that is only half clear. That is a method, not information, and there is no handout for it. But the charting is yours now.

Door two — book the free 20-minute fit call

Twenty minutes, no charge, and my only job on the call is to work out whether what I do is right for you. If it isn't, I will say so.

The program is Rooted Reset: The 12-Week Cycle Overlay Protocol. Twelve weeks with an end date. Four hours 1:1 with me — an hour to set your protocol, an hour at week five to build your reintroduction schedule off your own chart, an hour at week eleven to turn it into a maintenance plan you run without me. Weekly group calls, Tuesdays at noon Pacific, all recorded. Daily charting continues, still under ninety seconds.

It takes twelve weeks rather than fourteen days because of the reintroduction. Fourteen days tells you whether the pattern is there. It cannot tell you which foods are actually yours — that needs them tested one at a time, in windows where the reading can be trusted, with someone reading the log with you. Reintroduction is the part every handout skips.

What I promise is the process and the clarity. I do not promise a symptom outcome, because nobody honest can.

Bring your chart. Bring your panel report too, if you have one.

Book it here:

To supply[OPERATOR INPUT: fit call booking link]

Who I will turn away, said out loud: California residents, because I am not licensed to work with you. Anyone with an active eating disorder in the picture — that is care I am not the right person to give. Anyone who needs medical management. Anyone whose picture isn't gut-dominant, where I would be an expensive detour. I would rather say no in twenty free minutes than find out in week three.

Door three — take your chart to your own physician

You may not need me at all, and this door is real.

You now have something hard to dismiss: fourteen dated rows, one consistent scale, a stated pattern. That is a different appointment from the one you have been having.

The Physician Conversation Sheet — how to use twelve minutes

  • Lead with the chart, not the story. "I tracked fourteen days on a 0–10 scale. My worst days were cycle days 23, 24 and 26. My best days were 8 through 14."
  • Say the pattern in one sentence. "My symptoms appear to intensify in the week before my period, and I'd like that on the record."
  • Name what you want looked at, and let them decide. "Can we check ferritin?" "Can we look at a thyroid panel?" You are naming markers, not ordering tests.
  • Ask one closing question. "Given this pattern, is there anything you'd want to rule out?"
  • Take the chart on paper. Leave a copy.

I do not order labs and I do not interpret them. Your physician does. If your chart makes that appointment go better, this guide has done its job whether or not you ever speak to me.

Part 6

What I don't do, and why

Short list, because you have earned a straight answer from somebody.

Short list, because you have earned a straight answer from somebody.

  • I don't run IgG food-sensitivity panels. "I paid $400 for a test that told me to be scared of broccoli." What happens next is always the same: forty suspects and no method for clearing a single one. A longer list of foods to fear is not progress. It is the same problem, itemised.
  • I don't run hair mineral tests.
  • I don't order labs. I ask your physician for a conventional panel instead, and I give you the language to ask for it. That is their job.
  • I don't hand out supplement protocols or dosing. Not in a guide, not on a call.
  • I don't diagnose anything. I am a registered dietitian. Cycle overlay work is pattern-spotting, and I will not stretch it into a claim about your hormones.
  • I don't promise your symptoms will go away. I promise the process and the clarity — a written short list of what is actually yours, with thresholds where they apply. How much, not never again.
  • And I will never hand you a longer list of foods to avoid. You need a shorter one. That is the entire point.

The clinic with the big panel looks more thorough. It isn't. There, the panel is the product. Here, the refusal is.

Now go chart fourteen days

You have run every experiment anyone suggested, and most of them were sound. The conditions were wrong, not you. Fourteen rows will tell you more than four more years of guessing, and it costs ninety seconds a night.

Print the chart. Start tomorrow morning, not tonight — tonight you would be scoring a day you didn't watch.

Then pick your door.

Book the free 20-minute fit call →

To supply[OPERATOR INPUT: fit call booking link]

Twenty minutes. No charge. Bring your chart. I'll tell you if I can't help you.

Or chart it on your phone instead of on paper → /interactive-tool

Seven cohorts. 83 women. Roughly 90% of them finished — a completion rate, not an outcome. I quote it because finishing is the thing most protocols cannot get women to do.

I ate at a restaurant without googling the menu first for the first time in five years. — 12-week Rooted Reset client

Maya

Rooted Women's Nutrition provides nutrition education and coaching. It is not medical care, and nothing here diagnoses, treats, or replaces advice from your physician. Individual experience varies; Rooted Reset promises the process and the clarity, not a symptom outcome.

Now the part that counts

Score tonight. Then do it thirteen more times.

Reading this changed nothing yet. Fourteen evenings of ninety seconds is what turns it into a page of your own data — and a page of your own data is the only thing that has ever made this argument land with someone who has been let down four times.

If the pattern is not there, you have learned something real and you have not spent a dollar. If it is, come and talk to me.